Validity
Concept
Validityisthedegreeofvalidityofameasurement,thatis,thedegreetowhichameasurementtoolcanactuallymeasurethecharacteristictobemeasured,orsimplyreferstotheaccuracyandusefulnessofatestsex.Validityisthemostimportantconditionthatascientificmeasurementtoolmusthave.Insocialmeasurement,thevalidityofquestionnairesorscalesusedasmeasurementtoolsisrelativelyhigh.Discriminationvaliditymustclarifythepurposeandscopeofthemeasurement,considerthecontenttobemeasuredandanalyzeitsnatureandcharacteristics,checkwhetherthecontentofthemeasurementisconsistentwiththepurposeofthemeasurement,andthendeterminewhetherthemeasurementresultreflectsthedegreeofthecharacteristictobemeasured;
Nature
1.Validityisrelative
Thevalidityofanytestisforacertaingoal,orTestswillonlybeeffectiveiftheyareusedforpurposesandoccasionsthatareconsistentwiththeobjectivesofthetest.Therefore,whenevaluatingthevalidityofthetest,thepurposeandfunctionofthevaliditytestmustbeconsidered.
2.Validityhascontinuity
Thevalidityofatestisusuallyexpressedbyacorrelationcoefficient,whichonlydiffersindegree,ratherthan"all-in"Orthedifferenceof"nothing".Validityisbasedontestresults.
Function
1.Predictionerror
Theactualmeaningofthevaliditycoefficientisoftenexpressedbythedeterminingcoefficient,whichmeansthesquareofthecorrelationcoefficient,whichindicatesthatthetestpredictscorrectlyOrtheratioofthevarianceoftheexplainedeffectstandardtothetotalvariance.
2.Predictivescores
(Predictthescoresfromthepredictedscores)IfthetwovariablesXandYarelinearlyrelated,aslongastheregressionequationbetweenthetwoisdetermined,thenOnevariablecanbeestimatedfromanothervariable.
3.Predictionefficiencyindex
(Theerrorreducedcomparedtoblindprediction)
Type
Internalvalidity
Theconceptofinternalvalidity
Theinternalvalidityofastudyreferstothedegreeofclaritywithwhichacertainrelationshipexistsbetweentheindependentvariableandthedependentvariableofthestudy.Iftherelationshipbetweentheindependentvariableandthedependentvariableisnotaffectedbytheexistenceofothervariables,andthusbecomesambiguousorcomplicated,thenthisstudyhasinternalvalidity.Thequestionsitinvolvesare:
(1)Isthereacertainrelationshipbetweenthetwoormorevariablesstudied?
(2)Isittruethatthechangeoftheindependentvariablecausedthechangeofthedependentvariable?
Researchdesignshouldeffectivelycontrolandeliminatethevariousvariablesthatmaybeinvolved,sothatvariablesthatarenotrelatedtotheresearchobjectiveshavelittleornoimpactontheresearchresults.Therefore,betweentheresearchvariables(Forexample,therelationshipbetweentheindependentvariableandthedependentvariableisdefiniteandtrue,whichmeansthattheinternalvalidityofastudyishigh.
Factorsaffectinginternalvalidity
Therearemanyfactorsaffectinginternalvalidity.Insummary,therearefourmainfactors:history,researchsubjects,researchmethodsandprocedures,andstatisticalregressioneffects.Aspectfactors.
Conditionsofinternalvalidity
Theinternalvalidityofthestudywillnotbeformedautomatically.Theinternalvalidityisobtainedmainlythroughresearchdesign,carefulselectionofvariables,effectivecontrolofvariousvariables,ensuringthedefiniterelationshipbetweenresearchvariables,andeliminatingtheinfluenceofvariablesunrelatedtotheresearchobjectivesontheresearchresults.Thefourfactorsmentionedaboveshouldbecontrolledduringresearch.Themosteffectivewayistouserandomizationprocedures.Forvariousspecificsituationsofeducationalscientificresearch(suchasdifferentresearchactivities),therewillbecertaindifferencesinthetypes,numbers,andeffectsoffactorsthataffectinternalvalidity.Theyshouldbeanalyzed,estimated,identified,andadoptedaccordingtothespecificconditions.Measuresshouldbecontrolledoreliminatedtoimprovetheinternalvalidityoftheresearch.
Externalvalidity
Externalvalidity
TheexternalvalidityoftheresearchreferstothegeneralizationanduniversalapplicationoftheresearchresultstothepopulationfromwhichthesamplecomesandtootherThedegreeintheoverallpopulation,thatis,therepresentativenessanduniversalapplicabilityoftheresearchresultsandvariableconditions,timeandbackground.Externalvaliditycanbesubdividedintotwocategories:overallvalidityandecologicalvalidity.
Overallvalidityreferstothedegreeandabilityoftheresearchresultstoadapttothepopulationfromwhichtheresearchsamplecomes,orthegeneralsignificancetothepopulation.Tomaketheresearchresultsapplicabletothepopulation,asamplemustbeselectedrandomlyfromthepopulationsothatthesampleisrepresentativeofthepopulation.Iftheselectedsamplesarebiasedortoosmalltorepresentthepopulation,theresultswillbedifficulttosummarizethecharacteristicsofthepopulation.
Ecologicalvalidityreferstothedegreeandabilityofresearchresultsthatcanbegeneralizedandadaptedtootherresearchconditionsandscenarios.Tomaketheresearchresultsapplicabletootherresearchconditionsandscenarios(forexample,thedifferencesbetweenindependentanddependentvariables,researchprocedures,researchbackground,researchtime,andresearchers,etc.),researchconditionsandscenariosmustbespeciallydesignedtoensurethatotherTheconditionsandscenariosarerepresentative.
Itisgenerallybelievedthatinternalvalidityisanecessaryconditionforexternalvalidity,butitisnotasufficientcondition.Researchresultswithlowinternalvaliditycannotbesaidtobeuniversallymeaningfultootherscenarios;however,researchresultswithhighinternalvaliditymaynotnecessarilybegeneralizedtootheroverallsandcontexts.Theimportantsignificanceofeducationalscientificresearchistodiscovertheuniversallawsofeducationalactivitiesandguidethedevelopmentofeducationalwork.Therefore,itisveryimportanttoimprovetheexternalvalidityofresearchresults.Nomatterhowhightheinternalvalidityofastudyis,ifitsresultsareonlyadaptedtoaspecificscope,specificmeasurementtools,specificresearchprocedures,andspecificresearchconditions,then,fromtheperspectiveofobtaininggeneralknowledgeandrevealinguniversallaws,Itsvalueandsignificancearenotgreat.Therefore,theexternalvalidityandinternalvalidityofthestudyarenotinferiorinimportance.
Factorsinfluencingexternalvalidity
Factorsinfluencingexternalvaliditymainlyincludefouraspects:researchsubjects,variabledefinitionandtestingaspects,researchmethodsandprocedures,Fortheexperimenter.
Conditionsofexternalvalidity
Theabovefourfactorssometimesexistalone,andsometimestheyhaveseveralinfluencesatthesametime.Toimprovetheexternalvalidityoftheresearch,wemustpayattentiontoeliminatingandcontrollingtheabove-mentionedvariousinfluencingfactorsintheresearch.Therequirementofexternalvalidityisthattheresearchcanmeettheobjectiveconditionsandbeapplicabletoalargerpopulation.Amongthem,thekeypartistodoagoodjobofsampling.Samplingworkincludesnotonlythesamplingofsubjects,butalsotheselectionofrepresentativeresearchbackground(workplace,school,home,laboratory),researchtools,researchprocedures,andtime.Thecloserthesamplingbackgroundistotheactualscenario,thestrongertheavailability,applicability,andgeneralizationoftheresearchresults.Generallyspeaking,randomsampling,increasingthedegreeofsimulatingrealisticscenarios,usingavarietyofrelatedresearchmethods,andchangingresearchconditionstoseekuniversallymeaningfulconclusionsareimportantconditionsforobtainingexternalvalidityandimprovingtheapplicabilityofresearchresults.
Conceptionvalidity
Introductiontoconceptionvalidity
Theconceptionvalidityofresearchreferstotherationalityandscientificityoftheoreticalconceptionorhypothesis,anditstransformationintoTheappropriatenessandoperabilityoftheresearchobjectives.Itinvolvestheestablishmentofaresearchplanandatheoreticalconceptionofmeasurementindicators(oratheoreticalconceptionofobservationindicators)anditsoperationalization,thatis,thevalidityofthetheoreticalconceptionanditsconversion.Inorderfortheresearchtohaveahighconceptionvalidity,thetheoreticalconceptionoftheresearchmustfirstberigorouslystructuredandclearlystructuredtoformacertain"conceptionnetwork",andsecondly,astrictabstractandoperationaldefinitionoftheresearchcontent(suchastheresearchconceptionFeatures,giveclearoperationaldefinitions).
Factorsaffectingconceptvalidity
Therearethreemainfactorsaffectingconceptvalidity:researchconception,researchmethodsandprocedures,subjectiveexpectationsofexperimenters,andparticipantsSpeculationonresearch.
ConditionsforConceptualValidity
Forresearchtohavehigherconceptionvalidity,thefollowingfourconditionsshouldbemet:
(1)TheoreticalconceptionrequiresstructureRigorous,logical,andhierarchical,formingakindof"conceptionnetwork".Forexample,thedevelopmentofchildren'sself-awarenessisdividedintothreeaspects:self-knowledge,self-experienceandself-control,andself-knowledgeisfurthersubdividedintotheknowledgeofthephysicalself,theknowledgeofthepsychologicalselfandtheknowledgeofthesocialself.Suchatheoreticalconceptionismorerigorous,complete,andlayered,andformsa"network"foreasyunderstandingandresearch.
(2)Clearlyandaccuratelydefinetheenvironmentalconditionsandvariablesoftheresearch.Forexample,thesubjectof"StudyonDivergentThinkingofStudentsintheFifthGradeofPrimarySchool"requiresacleardefinitionoftheagegroup,physicalandintellectualdevelopment,learning,life,andsocialenvironmentofthesubjects,usingbothwrittenandlanguageformstobecompleteandaccurate.Statetheresearchvariables.
(3)Makeaccurateandstrictoperationaldefinitionsfortheresearchvariables,andselectcorrespondingandobjectiveobservationindicators.
(4)Avoidusingasinglemethodorasingleindicatortorepresentoranalyzemulti-dimensional,multi-level,andmulti-facetedthingsandactivities,andusemultiplemethodsandmultipleindicatorsasmuchaspossibletoanalyzefromdifferentperspectivesStudythesametheoreticalideas.
Educationalscienceresearchoftencontainscomplexandmulti-dimensionaltheoreticalideas.Howtoimprovethevalidityofresearchideasisaproblemthatneedstobepaidspecialattentiontowhenconductingresearchdesign,anditisalsoanimportantcontenttoimprovethelevelofeducationalscienceresearch..
Validityofstatisticalconclusions
Thevalidityofstatisticalconclusionsisaboutthevaliditytestofthedataanalysisandprocessingproceduresoftheresearch,orinotherwords,itisthedataanalysisproceduresandmethodsoftestingtheresultsoftheresearch.Anindicatorofeffectiveness.Thebasicquestionofthevalidityofstatisticalconclusionsistostudytheerror,thesourceofvariationandhowtoproperlyusethestatisticalsignificancetest.Itdoesnotinvolvethesourceofsystematicdeviation,buttheproblemofstudyingtheerrorvariationandhowtoproperlyusethestatisticalsignificancetest.Forexample,whenusingasmallsampleofresearchdata,becausethesamplecompositionandmeasurementdatahaverelativelylargefluctuationsandpoorstability,itisunreliabletorelyonstatisticalsignificancetomakeinferences.Inthiscase,poweranalysisshouldbeusedtoseehowmucheffectcanbetestedforacertainsamplerange,degreeofvariation,andalphalevel.Thisisthequestionconsideredforthevalidityofstatisticalconclusions.
Factorsaffectingstatisticalvalidity
Themainfactorsaffectingstatisticalvalidityare:lowstatisticalpower,violationoftheconditionsofuseofstatisticalmethods,andlowmeasurementreliability.
Conditionsforthevalidityofstatisticalconclusions
Thevalidityofthestatisticalconclusionsofthestudymainlydependsontwoconditions:oneisthequalityofthedata,andthevalidityofthedataanalysisprocedureisbasedonthedataOnthebasisofthequalityofdata,thevalidityofstatisticalconclusionscannotbediscussedintheresearchofpoordataquality;thesecondisthestatisticaltestmethod.Variousstatisticalmethodsusedindataanalysishavetheirownclearrequirementsforstatisticaltestconditions.Inthisstudy,thestatisticaltestconditionsarenotclearorviolated,whichwillsignificantlyreducethevalidityofthestatisticalconclusions.
Evaluationmethod
Contentvalidity
(content-relatedvalidity)
Whatiscontentvalidity
Contentvalidityreferstotheapplicabilityoftestquestionstorelevantcontentorbehavioralsampling,soastodeterminewhetherthetestisarepresentativesamplingofthedesiredbehavioraldomain.
Twoevaluationmethodsofcontentvalidity
1.Expertjudgmentmethod;2.Statisticalanalysismethod(raterreliability\duplicatereliability\halfreliability\retestmethod);3.Empiricalinferencemethod(experimentaltest)
Characteristicsofthreecontentvalidity
Contentvalidityisoftenconfusedwithfacevalidity.Thefacevalidityisdeterminedbythelayman'ssuperficialinspectionofthetest.Itdoesnotreflectwhatthetestactuallymeasures,butonlyreferstowhatthetestlookslikeonthesurfacetobemeasured;contentvalidityisdeterminedbyaqualifiedjudge(Experts)Establishedtoevaluatethetestindetailandsystematically.
Construct-relatedvalidity
(construct-relatedvalidity)
Onewhatisconstruct-relatedvalidity
ItmeansthatthetestcanmeasuretheoreticallyThedegreeoftheconceptionorcharacteristicofthetest,thatis,whethertheresultofthetestcanconfirmorexplainthehypothesis,termorconceptionofacertaintheory,andthedegreeofexplanation.
Methodsfortheestimationofthevalidityofthesecondconception
1.Analysisofthetestitself(usecontentvaliditytoverifythevalidityoftheconception)
2.BetweenthetestsMutualcomparison:Compatibilityvalidity(comparisonwiththesamematuretest),discriminationvalidity(comparisonwithsimilarordistinguishabletests),factoranalysismethod
3.EfficacystandardeffectProofofthedegreeofresearch
4.Confirmationbyexperimentalandobservationmethods
Validity-relatedvalidity
(criterion-relatedvalidity)
Efficacycriterion,thatis,thereferencestandardformeasuringthevalidityofthetest,referstothebehaviorofourinterestthatcanbedirectlyandindependentlymeasured.Thebehaviorweareinterestedinisthebehaviortobepredicted.Thisisageneralconcept,soitmustbedeterminedbyoperablemeasurementstohavepracticalsignificance.Therefore,itisnecessarytosubdividetheperformancestandardintotwolevels,oneisthe"conceptualperformancestandard"atthetheoreticallevel,andtheotheristhe"effectstandardmeasurement"attheoperationaldefinitionlevel.
Validitycriterionvalidityisalsocalledempiricalvalidity,whichreflectstheeffectivenessofthetestinpredictingthebehaviorofanindividualinacertainsituation.
Accordingtowhetherthebenchmarkdataisobtainedatthesametimeasthetestscores,itcanbedividedintosimultaneousvalidity(theconsistencyofthescoresofpeoplewithhighmoraleandlowmoraleinthemoraletest.)andpredictivevalidity..
Commonlyusedbenchmarksinclude
1.Academicachievement:suchasschoolperformance,academicqualifications,relatedawardsandhonors,teachers’assessmentofstudents’intelligence,etc.,whichareoftenusedasintelligencetestsEfficacycriteriacanalsobeusedascriteriaforcertainmultipleaptitudetestsandpersonalitytests;
2.Actualworkperformance:Itisthemostsatisfactorybenchmarkmeasurement,forgeneralintelligencetests,personalitytestsandsomeabilitiesEfficacycriteriaofthetendencytest;
3,specialtrainingperformance;
4,mentalillnessdiagnosis;
5,gradeevaluation:theobserverwantstomeasureaccordingtothetestApersonaljudgmentbasedontheperformanceofthesubjects’psychologicaltraits;
6.Comparisonofbenchmarkinggroups:thatis,tofindouttwogroupsthatdifferinbenchmarkingperformance,andcomparetheirThedifferenceintestscores;
7.Previouslyvalidtests:Thecorrelationbetweenanewtestandapreviouslyvalidtestisoftenusedasevidenceofvalidity.
Agoodperformancestandardmustmeetthefollowingconditions:
①Theperformancestandardmustmosteffectivelyreflectthegoalofthetest,thatis,theperformancestandardmeasurementitselfmustEffective;
②Efficacycriteriamusthavehighreliability,stabilityandreliability,andnotchangewithtimeandotherfactors;
③Efficacycriteriacanbemeasuredobjectively,withdataorgradeavailableToshow;
④Themethodofeffectstandardmeasurementissimple,time-savingandlabor-saving,economicalandpractical.
Evaluationmethodofvaliditycriterionvalidity
1.Correlationmethod:Validitycoefficientisthemostcommonlyusedvalidityindex,Especiallythestandardvalidity.ItisexpressedintermsofthePearsonproductdifferencecorrelationcoefficient,whichmainlyreflectsthecorrelationbetweentestscoresandefficacystandardmeasurements.Whenthetestscoreisacontinuousvariableandthecriteriondataisadichotomousvariable,thetwo-rowcorrelationformulaorthetwo-rowcorrelationformulacanbeusedtocalculatethevaliditycoefficient;whenthetestscoreisacontinuousvariableandthecriteriondataisagradeevaluation,useJassCalculationofPendorseriesrelatedformulas.
2.Differentiationmethod:Itisamethodtotestwhetherthetestscorecaneffectivelydistinguishthegroupdefinedbytheefficacystandard.Aftercalculatingthetvalue,youcanknowwhetherthedifferenceinscoresissignificant.Ifthedifferenceissignificant,itmeansthatthetestcaneffectivelydistinguishthegroupsdefinedbythevalidcriteria;otherwise,thetestisinvalid.Theoverlappercentagecanbecalculatedbycalculatingthepercentageofpeopleineachgroupwhosescoreexceeds(orbelow)theaverageoftheothergroup;inaddition,thepercentageofthecommonareaofthetwogroupscanalsobecalculated.Thegreatertheamountofoverlap,thesmallerthedifferencebetweenthetwogroupsofscores,thatis,theworsethevalidityofthetest.
3.Hitratemethod:Whenthetestisusedasthebasisforselection,theratioofthecorrectdecisionisusedasamethodofvalidity.Therearetwowaystocalculatethehitrate,oneistocalculatethetotalhitrate,andtheotheristocalculatethepositivehitrate.
4.Expectationtablemethod:Itisatwo-waytable,withpredictedscoresarrangedontheleftsideofthetable,andtheeffectstandardonthetopofthetable.Thelargerthepercentagenumbersonthediagonalfromthelowerlefttotheupperright,andthesmallertheotherpercentagenumbers,thehigherthevalidityofthetest;onthecontrary,themorescatteredthenumbers,thelowerthevalidity.
Identificationprocedure
Fromcontentvalidity,tocriterionvalidity,andthentoconstructvalidity,itcanberegardedasakindofprogression,thatis,constructvalidityneedstobemorethancriterionvalidityMoreinformation,criterionvalidityrequiresmoreinformationthancontentvalidity.
Validityhashigherrequirementsthanreliability.Reliabilityisanecessaryconditionforvalidity.Withoutreliabilitymeasurementtools,thereisnovalidity,buthighreliabilitymeasurementtoolsmaynothaveHighvalidity.
Influencingfactors
I.Factorsofthetestitself
Therepresentativenessoftestmaterials,testlength,testquestiontypes,difficulty,distinction,andarrangementmethodswillallbeAffectvalidity.
2.Interferencefactorsintheimplementationofthetest
1.Influencingfactorsofthemaintest
2.Influencingfactorsofthesubjects
3.Thenatureofthesamplegroup
Theheterogeneityofthesamegroup
Twointerferencevariables:Thenatureofthesamplegroupincludesage,gender,educationlevel,intelligence,motivation,interest,occupationandAnyrelatedcharacteristics,duetotheinfluenceofthesecharacteristics,makethetesthavedifferenttestabilitiesfordifferent.
Giselliproposedasetofmethodsonhowtofindinterferencevariables:
①Useregressionequationstoobtaineachperson’spredictedperformancescore,andcomparethescorewiththeactualperformancescoreIwanttocomparethescoresandgetthedifferencescoreD.IftheabsolutevalueofDislarge,itindicatesthattheremaybeinterferencevariablesinthetest.
②Accordingtotheanalysisofthecompositionofthesamplegroup,findthecontrolgroup,andcalculatethevalidityseparately,soastofindouttheinterferencevariablesliketheaboveexampleofthetaxidriver.
③Forthegrouptobetested,accordingtosomeeasilyvisibleinterferencevariables,itisdividedintotwosubgroupswithhighpredictabilityandlowpredictability.Forgroupswithhighpredictability,thevalidityofthetestobtainedwillbeimproved.
Four,thenatureoftheefficacystandard
Agoodefficacystandardmustmeetthefollowingconditions:
①Theefficacystandardmustmosteffectivelyreflectthetestobjectives,namelyEfficacystandardmeasurementitselfmustbeeffective;
②Efficacystandardmusthavehighreliability,stableandreliable,andnotchangewithtimeandotherfactors;
③Efficacystandardcanbemeasuredobjectively,Canbeexpressedbydataorgrade;
④Themethodofeffectstandardmeasurementissimple,time-savingandlabor-saving,economicalandpractical.
Testdimensions
1)Facevalidity.Referstothevolumestandardthatthetestshouldmeet,thatis,whetherasetoftestquestionsisappropriateonthesurface.Forexample,ifatestofreadingcomprehensionincludesdialectvocabularythatmanysubjectshavenotlearned,itcanbeconsideredthatthetestlacksfacevalidity.Facevalidityisaguaranteefactorfortestingthenormallevelofsubjects.
2)Contentvalidity.Referstowhetherasetoftestquestionshastestedthecontentthatshouldbetestedorwhetherthetestedcontentreflectstherequirementsofthetest,thatis,thedegreeofrepresentativenessandcoverageofthetest.Forexample,ifacertainsetofpronunciationskillstestquestionsonlyexaminecertainskillsthatarenecessaryforpronunciation,suchasthepronunciationofasinglephoneme,andnottheaccent,intonation,orthepronunciationofthephonemeinaword,thenthecontentofthetestiseffective.Thedegreeisverylow.
3)Constructvalidity.Referstothedegreetowhichtheitemsofasetoftestquestionsreflectthebasicaspectsofthetheoryonwhichthetestisbased.Forexample,basedonstructurallanguagetheory,itisbelievedthatsystematiclinguistichabitsareacquiredthroughsentencepatterns.Then,testitemsthatemphasizevocabularyandgrammaticalenvironmentlosetheircompilationvalidity.
4)Empiricalvalidity.Empiricalvalidityisameasureoftheeffectivenessofatest,whichisobtainedbycomparingatestwithoneormorestandardscales.Therearetwotypesofempiricalvalidity:oneisconcurrentvalidity,thatis,theresultofatestiscomparedwiththeresultofanothervalidtestatasimilartime,orthecoefficientobtainedbycomparingwiththeteacher'sappraisal;Thesecondispredictivevalidity,whichisacoefficientobtainedbycomparingtheresultofatestwiththelaterlanguageability,orwiththeteacher'slaterappraisalofstudents.
Generallyspeaking,whentestingthevalidityofatest,inadditiontoexaminingthecontentofthetestpaperaccordingtotherequirementsofthesyllabusandthetheoryofconceptvalidity,itisalsonecessarytousethemethodofcalculatingthecorrelationcoefficient.Thequantitativemethodistocalculatethecorrelationcoefficientbetweenthistestpaperandanothertestpaperthathasbeendeterminedtoaccuratelyreflectthesubject'slevel.Thehigherthecoefficient,thegreatertheeffectiveness.Thevalidityoftheclassroomtestshouldbebetween0.4-0.7,andthevalidityofthelargertestshouldbeabove0.7.
Validityanalysis
Therearemanymethodsforvalidityanalysis,andthemeasurementresultsreflectdifferentaspectsofvalidity.Themethodscommonlyusedtoanalyzethevalidityofquestionnairesmainlyincludethefollowing.
Singleitemandtotalsumcorrelationvalidityanalysis
FaceValidity.Alsocalledcontentvalidityorlogicalvalidity,itreferstothesuitabilitybetweenthecontentofthemeasurementandthemeasurementtarget.Itcanalsobesaidtorefertowhethertheselecteditemofthemeasurement"looks"inlinewiththepurposeandrequirementsofthemeasurement.Mainlybasedonthesubjectivejudgmentofthesurveydesigner.
Thismethodisusedtomeasurethecontentvalidityofthescale.Contentvalidityisalsocalledsurfacevalidityorlogicalvalidity,whichreferstowhetherthedesigneditemcanrepresentthecontentortopictobemeasured.Thecontentvalidityisoftenevaluatedbyacombinationoflogicalanalysisandstatisticalanalysis.Logicanalysisgenerallyinvolvestheresearcherorexpertjudgingwhethertheselecteditem"looks"inlinewiththepurposeandrequirementsofthemeasurement.Statisticalanalysismainlyadoptsthecorrelationanalysismethodofsingleitemandsumtoobtaintheevaluationresult,thatis,calculatethecorrelationcoefficientbetweenthescoreofeachitemandthetotalscoreoftheitem,andjudgewhetheritiseffectiveaccordingtowhetherthecorrelationissignificant.Ifthereareanti-intentionalitemsinthescale,theyshouldbeprocessedinreversebeforecalculatingthetotalscore.
CriterionValidityanalysis
CriterionValidity.Alsoknownascriterionvalidityorpredictivevalidity.Criteriavalidityreferstowhetherthedataobtainedbythescaleismeaningfulcomparedwiththevaluesofotherselectedvariables(criteriavariables).Accordingtothetimespan,thecriterionvaliditycanbedividedintosimultaneousvalidityandpredictivevalidity.Criterionvalidityanalysisisbasedonacertaintheorythathasbeendetermined,selectinganindicatorormeasurementtoolasthecriterion(efficacycriterion),andanalyzingtherelationshipbetweenthequestionnaireitemsandthecriterion.Differentvaluesandcharacteristicsshowsignificantdifferences,whicharevaliditems.Themethodofevaluatingcriterionvalidityiscorrelationanalysisordifferencesignificancetest.Inthevalidityanalysisofquestionnaires,itisoftenverydifficulttochooseanappropriatecriterion,whichlimitstheapplicationofthismethodtoacertainextent.
ConstructValidityAnalysis
ConstructValidity.Itreferstothedegreeofcorrespondencebetweenacertainstructurereflectedinthemeasurementresultandthemeasuredvalue.Themethodusedinstructuralvalidityanalysisisfactoranalysis.Themostconcernedquestionis:Whatcharacteristicsdoesthescaleactuallymeasure?Whenevaluatingconstructvalidity,investigatorsshouldtrytoexplainthetheoreticalquestionof"whythescaleiseffective"andconsiderwhatinferencescanbedrawnfromthistheoreticalquestion.Structuralvalidityincludeshomogeneityvalidity,heterogeneityvalidityandsemanticlogicvalidity.Somescholarsbelievethatthemostidealmethodofvalidityanalysisistousefactoranalysistomeasurethestructuralvalidityofthescaleortheentirequestionnaire.Themainfunctionoffactoranalysisistoextractsomecommonfactorsfromallvariables(items)ofthescale.Eachcommonfactorishighlycorrelatedwithacertaingroupofspecificvariables.Thesecommonfactorsrepresentthebasicstructureofthescale.Throughfactoranalysis,wecanexaminewhetherthequestionnairecanmeasureacertainstructureassumedbytheresearcherwhendesigningthequestionnaire.Intheresultsoffactoranalysis,themainindicatorsusedtoevaluatethevalidityofthestructurearecumulativecontributionrate,degreeofcommonalityandfactorloading.Thecumulativecontributionratereflectsthecumulativeeffectivenessofthecommonfactoronthescaleorquestionnaire,thecommonalityreflectstheeffectivenessofthecommonfactortoexplaintheoriginalvariable,andthefactorloadreflectsthedegreeofcorrelationbetweentheoriginalvariableandacommonfactor.
Latest: Unified software process
Next: Agricultural Chemistry